You can work around this problem by
reordering the Units database so that all units on each I/O Server
are before other units. If you have 2 I/O Servers, you must use two
different databases. Each database will put the units associated
with that I/O Server before the other: For example
Use this database order for I/O Server 1
Rec
No:
|
I/O
Server
|
Unit
Name
|
Unit
No
|
Mode
|
1 |
Server1
|
UnitOne
|
1 |
Standby
|
2 |
Server1
|
UnitTwo
|
2 |
Standby
|
3 |
Server2
|
UnitOne
|
1 |
Primary
|
4 |
Server2
|
UnitTwo
|
2 |
Primary
|
Use this database order for I/O Server 2
Rec
No:
|
I/O
Server
|
Unit
Name
|
Unit
No
|
Mode
|
1 |
Server2
|
UnitOne
|
1 |
Primary
|
2 |
Server2
|
UnitTwo
|
2 |
Primary
|
3 |
Server1
|
UnitOne
|
1 |
Standby
|
4 |
Server1
|
UnitTwo
|
2 |
Standby
|
This problem does not effect any Citect for Windows Clients or
Servers.
CIT are researching this problem and will post new information
here as it becomes available. |