Applies To: |
|
Summary: |
We have tried version 4.20 on two client
workstations. One running Windows95 and One running Windows NT
Workstation 4.0 Beta2. Both were setup using all the normal default
settings. Our IO server is running Citect V3.30 under Windows95.
The test client workstations were tested individually on the
existing control system. In both instances, after displaying a page
of about 70-80 tags (including Disk PLC tags) for a few minutes the
IO server starts to report Out of buffers lan.read.pool and the
Kernel buffer pool display's short count for lan.read.pool rises.
If the offending client is not shutdown in time, the IO server
eventually slows down to a crawl and some of the other clients on
the system lose contact with the IO server (Display tags greyed
out).
We do not experience this problem if we run Citect V3.3 on these same client workstations. Could this problem be related to the mixing of 16 and 32 bit client applications with a 16 bit application on the IO server? |
Solution: |
In version 3.40 and 4.20 we have made
various changes in increase the network performance. This was
mainly to cover the case when using TCP/IP as the network protocol
for Citect client/server communication. Microsoft has put in place
various "Optimisations" in TCP/IP which clash with Citects real
time requirements. In version 4.20 (not 3.40) we have increased the
defaults for the [LAN]ReadPool and [LAN]WritePool to 256. They are
still set at 64 in version 3.40 as these buffers use critical DOS
memory under Windows 3.11. We have also added a feature to try to
work around the performance degrading effect of TCP/IP. This
feature is enabled by default and you can disable it by setting
[LAN]KillPiggyBackAck=0. This feature has been added to versions
3.40 and 4.20. This feature causes extra network traffic and if the
Citect at the other end is before version 3.40 or 4.20 it will
cause extra loading on the lan.read.pool.
So what is happening in your setup is that the 4.20 computer is sending data very quickly to the 3.30 computer. The 3.30 computer cannot keep up with this data rate so it's receive buffers full up. Your solutions are:
Also if possible you should upgrade the 3.30 I/O server to 4.20 if there is 32 bit drivers for all the protocols you want to use. |
Keywords: |
Related Links
Attachments